🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not create binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the regional level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and others show that governments globally are no longer content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.